IT VISITS CHRIST AGAIN TO US?

If you are Christian or supporting or agnostic, or what she is, them attention will have called that at the moment that jumps the news of a scientific fact by which " demonstrates " the nonauthenticity of a relic jealously kept or of a miracle and like so guaranteed by the Church, they start themselves like impelled by means, mass media etc., and mainly those people, who I do not explain myself so that, restriegan immediately the news to you by the noses. You see it? - at the moment I am thinking about the Sheet Santa of Turin, and the demonstration of which anyone was a sheet, of later centuries, with much to the time that was believed, naturally the tests were carried out with Carbon 14.

Today it demonstrates that that test not is valid when a thermal elevation takes place, thing that happened, not only by possible radiation strange so that it was photographed the figure of Christ helped by áloes impregnated, but by famous fire in that it was rescued in his day of his coffer, that also underwent the blazes, even the metal impregnating melted on the own Sheet Santa in addition to other later findings.

I say to you that you make lack tests neither to favor nor in against, véanla to them, not in the Television, that is not appraised nor of " distant spot " the wished effect. On the matter them transfer to my article of September of 1993 in the Newspaper of Leon " Parapsicología science or religion... ". When tapeworm 40 years, in perfect mental balance (I create), I saw cheap projected the famous image of the Sheet Santa of Turin in a wall anyone with a projector. The printing was enormous, had had the luck to see much yacente Christ, crucificado product of the best Spanish imagineros much... never I felt more than an aesthetic emotion, but this... to find me with Jesus Christ, thus suddenly, was of an enormous printing, until the point of to have changed in many aspects of my life. How he would be in east life Man. How not to include/understand, at that moment the force of the cristiandad through the centuries. If all that were evident. (Luckyly later I found out that they are hundreds of thousands of people, those that have felt like I those same effects).

All this comes to collation of the news which I read in the press, from Eduardo García de Enterría. Christ revived again? And that seems to me that there is somewhat unnoticed past in mass media in general. As figure knows of Christ continues discussing, even, existence denies his, by his lack of historicidad rigorous, since what it knows itself it is through the Gospels that were not written more than later centuries and that were gathered, boca.a.boca, is to say orally, it is then for the rationalist ones a mitológica figure, become films, recent many of them, are written novels, all of them with the same purpose Jesus Christ was not (to have existed) as the Christians paint us. But what eagerness to destroy our beliefs, that forms so twisted with so annulling to Christ. Why if he dealed with man good, brave, that he gave little that it had left, until his mantle that protected to him of the nocturnal cold. Why so much is hated to him. Perhaps to make those words good... " I say to you that you will be with me or against my "...? Then Jesus Christ from today or rather, for few years, has been historical figure (if, if... indeed at this time of Romario, Romualdo). Carsten P. Thiede President of the scientific committee of the Museum John Rockefeller of Jerusalem shows to a papyrus 60 years previous to ours Era (Téngase in account that the oldest document, had a dating of century II d. of C., good to end.

In 1972 a Spanish and Catalan papirólogo (C.J.) Jose 0'Callaghan, had said that between the numerous documentation found in Qumrán was a fragment of the Gospel of San Marcos, therefore transferred to us automatically to year 68, there was discussion more and rejection (like which it is a Spanish although in this case it almost always has a rare last name), now has been to give the right him, is a Greek version of the Gospel of San Marcos, so in addition to an exhaustive study filológico etc., the incorporation of a new type of microscope with laser (patent of a biologist was added who considers that he is previous to Qumrán In Christmas of 1994 in front page of speech already treated in numerous scientific publications). The controversy is served the intellectual knives are prepared to make pieces our first spiritual and intellectual pleasure, against the published book """ Eyewitness of Jesus ". They do not doubt that 14 or something similar those of always will run with their Carbon and that the discussion will be opened during years, and perhaps it is closed never. We believing them, will believe in the veracity of this miraculous fragment of San Marcos, that appears now to give you lie full to that they doubted the historicidad of Jesus, who spoke and built as the Gospels relate. No longer we are only believing, men and women with Faith but that like they are done excavations and finds places etc. that describe in that famous book " the Bible to us was right ". Tests that attest the truth of fehaciente way, now written,

Each one is free to believe, or to let think what it preached, but from now on will be very difficult to put in doubt the truth of this predicación. Science from now on allows to assure that they are " authentic ". Formidable event, to the margin of the beliefs of everyone.

All this that I say, is removed and abstracted without a doubt with the best possible will, of I articulate of Eduardo García de Enterría, member of the Real Academy of the Language, and investigator and scientist.

Manuel Carlón Guzmán.