The biodiversity and the climatic change

 

 

The World, Natura supplement, 10 of November of 2007

 

And if the climatic change is the maximum preoccupation at the present time, another very important question at international level also exists: it is the fight by the resources of the two operated zones less until the present time by the human species, the Artic

and the Antarctic. If the U.S.A., Canada, Denmark, Norway and Russia have  initiated this same summer the dangerous race by the existing vindication of the zones of commercial operation of hydrocarbons and other raw materials in the Glacial ocean Artic, the United Kingdom has begun to investigate the possibility of operating fossil fuels of the marine bottoms of the Antarctic. This last situation can give rise to the loss of the biodiversity that exists in those unexplored zones or little occupied until now by the human species. This one is the alert message that has sent to Peter B. Reich, university professor of Ecology and Forest Physiology of the University of Minnesota (the U.S.A.). This investigator indicates several important ideas in relation to the subject of this article:

 

1ª) the plants could arrive at their limit as carbon drains with the abrupt increase of CO2 in the atmosphere; this increase is specially serious in the case of fires, that they release to the abundant atmosphere CO2 that took stored decades in biomass form. It does not

have necessarily to take to us to plant trees in all the surface of the planet, since it is not possible and in addition the trees at the beginning of his growth there are moments at which they have a neutral balance with respect to the CO2 emission; it would be much more important avoiding to cut the old trees that suppose a great amount of stored CO2.

 

2ª) a factor that can be important at the time of knowing if the plants will manage to maintain their paper of important carbon drains is the diversity of the forest ecosystems. Thus, the loss of biodiversity of these ecosystems will possibly cause a diminution of

its capacity to absorb CO2. Nitrogen is a fundamental element at the time of maximizing the amount of carbon that the forests are able to extract of the atmosphere. If it is little in the zones where the forests predominate, being however abundant where these last ones are scarce as it is the case of the U.S.A. and Europe, then effectiveness

of the wooded zones in its assignment of absorption of atmospheric CO2 will not be able to be arrived at the maxim.

 

Thus, today one knows that the oceanic and terrestrial ecosystems restrain 50% of the global heating due to the gas discharges of effect conservatory, but in fact it is not known with certainty until where they can arrive, if until 55% or more, being this question an important incognito to keep awake for really knowing what to rely to us. As an example of two critic situations of the present time we displayed the two photos of down, each one significant of impacts in the biodiversity of the planet.

 

British ship patrolling the Glacial ocean Antarctic (1988). /AP

 

 

A  tawny vulture, Gyps fulvus, released by naturalists in the Basque

Country. /Julio Carlos